Wednesday, May 12, 2021

Day: February 4, 2021

Featured Articles
Advantages of Choosing Online Casino over Land-Based Casino

Online casinos have become a lot more popular than land-based casinos and rightfully so. They took gambling to a whole new level and made it more exciting and entertaining. Although online and land-based casinos are completely different and offer a different vibe to players, most people nowadays prefer online casinos. There are many advantages of why you should choose an online to a land-based casino and here you will find more information about that.
Main Differences Between Online and Land-Based Casinos
First, the surroundings are different. Yes, playing in casinos has a social element attached to it, but that can also distract you from your main goal of playing games. Casino crowd can affect your thought process, can lead to making poor decisions and can make you feel exhausted. Driving to the casino, spending money, socializing, eating and other things can certainly affect your budget. This is where online casinos have the advantage because you can play in the comforts of your home without being distracted by anyone. There is no energy wasted on dressing up, then traveling and spending money. It is great when you can experience all thrills from playing slot free credit no deposit Thailand from the comforts of your home.
In online casinos, you can test your luck by playing free with play money. That is something you cannot do in a land-based casino. Online casinos let you practice your gambling skills and test your luck before you open an account. That is a good way to relax and get familiar with different types of casino games before investing your money. That is a major advantage of online casinos.
Casino games in online casinos go much faster. In land-based casinos, you often have to wait for your turn to come plus you have to deal with other players. In online casinos, the action goes much faster and you can entertain yourself a lot more. Speaking of games, online casinos offer a much wider choice than land-based casinos. There are all kinds of slots, table games, arcade-based games, bingo, jackpots and other games to try. You can explore a lot of them and then play your favorite ones over and over again.
Privacy and security are also higher in online casinos. In online casinos, there is no dress code to follow, you do not have to worry about others asking you private questions and you can freely play in your boxer shorts if that is what you want. You cannot be cheated by others because the latest technology implemented in online casinos is made to protect players.
There are many other advantages of playing in online casinos and these were just a few of them. In addition, for anyone who interested in gambling in Thailand thaicasinoguru Consider things mentioned here, make a good choice and start playing your favorite casino games today. The thrill and excitement from online casinos cannot be matched by anything else, so give it a try and enjoy the wide variety of games on offer.

คาสิโน ออนไลน์ จีคลับ
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ pantip
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ 777

Alex (1985- ), Alexis (2001- ), Connor (1997- ), Dallas Stars, Draisaitl, Hockey, Ice, K'Andre (2000- ), Kaprizov, Kirill, Lafreniere, Laine, Leon (1995- ), Marleau, McDavid, Miller, Montreal Canadiens, National Hockey League, New Jersey Devils, New York Rangers, Ovechkin, Patrick (1979- ), Patrik (1998- ), Smith, Toronto Maple Leafs, Ty (2000- )
The N.H.L. Schedule Is Shaky, but McDavid and Draisaitl Are Steady

In the month ahead, the N.H.L. plans to employ the serene scenes of Lake Tahoe as a backdrop for two outdoor games. But the 19 days of competition in January brought a bit of chaos to the league’s schedule.Since the season began on Jan. 13, dozens of players have been placed on the Covid-19 protocol-related absence list, which includes players who test positive and those who are being monitored because of close contact with someone who tested positive.Despite the format changes and shortened schedule, the season has had its share of constants. Most of the league’s top teams from last season have continued to thrive, and superlative performers like Edmonton’s Connor McDavid and Leon Draisaitl raised their scoring pace to seldom-seen levels, continuing their offensive dominance from last season.All statistics and standings are updated entering Thursday’s games.The schedule has had to be rewritten.The N.H.L. had a rocky path to resumption, and the turbulence did not end once the parameters of the 2021 season were set.The Devils, Buffalo Sabres, Vegas Golden Knights and Minnesota Wild were affected by the virus as the calendar turned from January to February.The league has made postponement decisions on a case-by-case basis. Unlike the N.B.A., the N.H.L. has set no minimum number of dressed players for a game to be staged. The N.H.L. has avoided some cancellations by having practice squads available to each team.For Vegas, only the coaching staff was initially affected, and the team played its Jan. 26 game against the St. Louis Blues with its general manager and minor-league coaching staff behind the bench. But after at least three coaches and two players were added to the Covid-19 list, three of the Knights’ games were postponed.Earlier this week, the league announced the postponement of Devils games through at least Saturday. The team, which last played on Sunday, had 14 players on the Covid absence list on Tuesday. The Buffalo Sabres, the Devils’ most recent opponent, will not play again until at least Monday. And the league on Wednesday postponed the Wild’s games through at least Tuesday.The league’s stars are off to strong starts, and two have been traded.In this season of turmoil, few things have been certain. But the Edmonton Oilers’ two-headed monster of Draisaitl, the reigning most valuable player, and McDavid, the 2016-17 M.V.P., has been rock solid once again.How copious has this tandem’s scoring been? The pair closed the month by combining for 11 points in an 8-5 victory over the Ottawa Senators. In January, they had a staggering 43 points in 11 games, with McDavid averaging two points per game and Draisaitl falling a point shy of that clip. McDavid’s eight goals tied him for the league lead in January with Vancouver’s Brock Boeser, and his 14 assists were second only to Draisaitl’s 15.To put the Edmonton duo’s feats in context, Anaheim Ducks skaters produced 41 points in January, meaning Draisaitl and McDavid outscored that entire team.Toronto Maple Leafs forward Mitchell Marner and Colorado center Nathan MacKinnon were among the top five January scorers, but MacKinnon is out with a lower-body injury to start February.A star was also involved in a blockbuster trade, with the Winnipeg Jets shipping the sniping winger Patrik Laine and the former first-round pick Jack Roslovic to the Columbus Blue Jackets for center Pierre-Luc Dubois.In net, most teams have split starts more evenly among their top two goalies. Carolina’s Petr Mrazek, Vegas’s Marc-André Fleury and Vancouver’s Thatcher Demko have thrived in platoons. Mrazek and Fleury posted goals-against averages of one or below in January — they also ranked first and second in save percentage — while Demko did the same in his last three starts. Colorado’s Philipp Grubauer led the league in wins with six.Kings center Anze Kopitar, 33, has also returned to peak form, as the 10-month layoff for nonplayoff teams benefited Los Angeles’ 30-something veterans. His 11 assists in January were the fourth most in the N.H.L. He had one more than the wunderkind defensemen Cale Makar of Colorado and Quinn Hughes of Vancouver, who finished first and second in last year’s Calder Trophy voting.Some rookies have impressed early.This year’s Calder Trophy voting for the N.H.L.’s top rookie may be dominated by players in their 20s, instead of teenagers from the last couple of drafts.Goalie Vitek Vanecek, 25, was thrust into action for Washington after Braden Holtby departed for Vancouver in free agency, the backup Henrik Lundqvist announced he would miss the season because of a heart condition and the starter Ilya Samsonov tested positive for coronavirus, according to The Washington Post. Vanecek was the January rookie of the month after winning five games, tops among rookies.But Kevin Lankinen, 25, leads all rookies in save percentage and goals-against average, having turned the corner on his competitors in the Chicago Blackhawks’ open casting call for a No. 1 goalie.The top point producer and nickname-earner among rookies has been Minnesota winger Kirill Kaprizov, also known as Kirill the Thrill and Dollar Bill Kirill. Kaprizov, a 23-year-old Russian, was a fifth-round pick in 2015 who then charted a magnificent career at the professional and international level in his home country. He was the youngest player on the gold medal-winning side at the 2018 Olympics and an offensive leader for C.S.K.A. Moscow in the Kontinental Hockey League.When he arrived in the N.H.L., Kaprizov became the first player in league history to record three points and an overtime game-winning goal in his debut. For an encore, he set up the overtime winner in his second game.Devils defenseman Ty Smith, 20, tied Kaprizov for the rookie lead in both points and assists in January. Rangers defenseman K’Andre Miller, 21, leads all rookies with a plus-seven rating, an uncommon achievement for a player on a last-place team with a negative goal differential.The Rangers held Alexis Lafreniere, the No. 1 overall pick in the 2020 draft, out of the World Junior Championships so he could prepare for the N.H.L. season. But he had just one point, a goal, in eight January games.Races begin in new divisions.All seven Canadian franchises were moved into the new North Division, requiring more shuffling.Five former Pacific teams merged with three former Central squads to make the West Division. The former Central Division teams — St. Louis, Colorado and Minnesota — occupied the first three positions in the standings before Thursday’s games. The Avalanche have one of the league’s best goal differentials at plus-14.After moving to the Central, the Florida teams got off to strong starts, despite being affected by Dallas’s postponements. The Panthers posted a 5-0-1 record in January, while last year’s Stanley Cup champion, the Tampa Bay Lightning, darted out to a 4-1-1 start.The North is the only seven-team division, yet it has five of the 10 highest-scoring teams thus far. Montreal — which was seeded 24th in the 24-team playoffs last season — leads the league in goals per game and in goal differential. The Canadiens are in first place, ahead of the Toronto Maple Leafs, who retooled their supporting cast during the off-season.In the East, the Boston Bruins and Buffalo Sabres were tossed in with six former Metropolitan Division teams, including the Devils, Islanders and Rangers. In what promises to be a competitive race, the Bruins and Philadelphia Flyers are tied for the division lead.Veterans have milestones approaching.Alex Ovechkin returned to action on Saturday after his four-game absence due to the league’s coronavirus protocols. He resumed his pursuit of the career goal-scoring record, and in dramatic fashion. His overtime game-winner against Boston was his 708th goal, tying him with Mike Gartner, another Capitals great, for seventh on the career list. Ovechkin remained 186 goals behind Wayne Gretzky’s record entering Thursday’s game against the Rangers.Another record that once seemed unassailable now appears likely to fall. San Jose Sharks forward Patrick Marleau last week played his 1,731st game, tying Ron Francis for fourth on the career list. If Marleau finishes the season with at least 45 games played, he will surpass Gordie Howe for the N.H.L. record. Howe, though, played an additional 419 games in the World Hockey Association.

เกมส์ยิ่งปลา คาสิโน ฟรีเครดิต
ฟรีเครดิตทดลองเล่น คาสิโน
เกมส์ คาสิโน ออนไลน์
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ได้เงินจริง

High Stakes Poker S8 E8: Find Out Which Player Went Broke & Quit the Game

February 04, 2021
Chad Holloway

Wednesday’s latest “High Stakes Poker” episode on PokerGO was a continuation of the last week’s game, which was played $200/$400/$800 w/ an $800 ante from the third blind.
The episode started with six players in their seats while Tom Dwan was sitting out. Here’s how things stack up at the top of the broadcast:

Rick Salomon$606,000

Jean-Robert Bellande$489,100

John Andress$298,000

Sean Perry$271,600

Damien Leforbes$157,800

Michael Schwimer$75,700

Leforbes vs. Schwimer – No Apologies for Running Good

In the first hand of the new episode, Damien Leforbes raised to $2,500 from middle position with the and the ever-aggressive Michael Schwimer three-bet to $9,000 from the cutoff holding the . Action folded back to Leforbes and he called to see the flop, which gave Schwimer trip eights.
Leforbes check-called a bet of $6,000 and then check-called one of $15,000 on the turn. The river was gin for Leforbes, who checked his full house. Schwimer bet $24,000, which left him just $21,000 behind, and Leforbes check-raised all in.
“Did you get lucky as shit on me?” a seemingly-frustrated Schwimer asked before calling off and discovering the bad news.
“I will not apologize for running good,” said Leforbes as he pulled in the $153,400 pot.
Dwan vs. Schwimer – “I’m in Pretty Good Shape”

After reloading to $100,000, Schwimer raised to $3,000 from the hijack and Dwan, who had returned to the game, three-bet to $13,000 from the small blind. Schwimer called, the flop fell . Dwan continued for $14,000 and Schwimer, who flopped top two pair, just called to see the turn.
Dwan made top pair but still checked, and Schwimer followed suit. On the river, Dwan bet $25,000 and Schwimer leaned back in his chair while letting out a big sigh before saying, “All in.”
It was $73,000 total and Dwan hit the tank.
“Didn’t snap-call, I’m in pretty good shape,” Schwimer claimed. Dwan thought long and hard before paying it off, and just like that Schwimer doubled back by claiming the $200,800 pot.
Sean Perry vs. Jean-Robert Bellande – JRB Puts Himself in Hot Water

Dwan opened for $2,500 with the and Sean Perry looked down at the next to act. He three-bet to $8,000 and then Jean-Robert Bellande, who had lost a six-figure pot to Dwan the hand prior, four-bet to $30,000 out of the small blind with the .
Dwan folded and Perry, the son of poker pro Ralph Perry, paused for a few beats before five-betting to $70,000. Bellande asked how much his opponent had behind, which was $246,000, and Bellande opted to call.
He flopped top pair on the flop and checked it over to Perry, who bet $40,000 into the pot of $144,100. Bellande called and then check-called a bet of $70,000 when the turn gave him an open-ended straight draw.
After the paired the board on the river, Bellande checked for the third time and Perry moved all in for his last $136,000. Bellande asked for a count and realized he had the bigger stack, albeit by a slim margin of $18,000. Eventually, Bellande called only to see his opponent table the goods.
With that, Perry doubled in a juicy pot worth $637,700.
Bryn Kenney vs. Sean Perry – Nine High, Not Like a Boss

After Rick Salomon left the game, a new player joined the game in Bryn Kenney, who bought in with a massive stack. Here’s how this stacked up at that point in time:

Bryn Kenney$836,900

Sean Perry$635,300

Tom Dwan$429,800

Michael Schwimmer$367,000

John Andress$223,800

Damien Leforbes$209,900

Jean-Robert Bellande$151,000

In his first hand of this episode, Kenney raised to $4,000 from the cutoff with the and Perry called from the big blind with the . The flop gave Perry trip eights and he check-called a bet of $10,000.
Perry checked again on the turn, which gave him a full house, and Kenney continued to bluff by firing out $23,000. Perry just called and then checked yet again on the river. Kenney took the bait and triple-barreled it with a bet of $64,000, but had to fold when Perry finally woke up with the check-raise to $219,000. Kenney took an early hit while Perry collected another big pot, this one worth $359,8000.
Michael Schwimmer vs. Bryn Kenney – One Will Quit the Game

In the penultimate hand of the episode, John Andress had the $1,600 straddle on and both Dwan and Bellande called, the former under the gun and the latter on the button. Schwimer then raised to $4,000 with the in the small blind and Kenney called from the big with the . All the aforementioned players called and it was five-way action to the flop.
Schwimer continued for $15,000 with top pair and Kenney raised to $52,000 with his set. Andress folded, Dwan gave up his flush draw, and Bellande got out of the way. Schwimer called and the turn gave him a wheel draw, which he checked.
Kenney bet $71,000, Schwimer called, and the completed the board on the river. Schwimer improved to two pair but checked to Kenney, who bet $165,000. Schwimer snap-called off his stack and then let loose some expletives upon seeing Kenney had the best hand to win the $597,200 pot.
“Alright, that was fun boys,” Schwimer told the table before giving up his seat in the game.
Remember, High Stakes Poker will air every Wednesday but is only available to PokerGO subscribers. If you’re not currently subscribed, you can get a monthly subscription for $14.99, a three-month plan for $29.99, and an annual subscription for $99.99.
*Images courtesy of PokerGO.

ปอยเปต คาสิโน
เกมส์ยิ่งปลา คาสิโน ได้เงินจริงไหม
เล่น คาสิโน
คาสิโน 88

LATEST NEWS, Poker News & History, poker players, STRATEGY
Polk Wins $1.2 Million in 25,000 Hands vs Negreanu

One of the most fervently followed heads-up matches in poker history came to an end with a seven-figure victory for Upswing Poker founder Doug Polk.
Polk came away with $1.2 million in profit in a heads-up match against archrival Daniel Negreanu, with the last of the 25,000-hand match wrapping up Wednesday. Polk and Negreanu battled it out at $200/$400 No-Limit Hold’em stakes on, capping off years of bad blood between the two poker icons.
The off-table animosity between the two seems to have simmered for now, but Polk dominated the action at the tables. The 25,000 hands played out over three months, taking 36 sessions to complete.
Polk entered the match as the heavy favorite to defeat Negreanu, and the match dubbed as “High Stakes Feud” by PokerGO saw Polk never really in danger of losing. Negreanu took an early lead in the opening sessions and held a $179,363 advantage after Day #8 on Nov. 19.
That session marked the last time Negreanu led in the challenge, however. At no point in the final 28 sessions did the Poker Hall of Fame member end a session with the lead over Polk.
Polk Erases Early Deficit and Cruises to Victory
Perhaps the most anticipated heads-up poker match in the history of the game, Negreanu and Polk began the High Stakes Feud with a 200-hand live session from the PokerGO Studio at Aria Las Vegas. Negreanu came out ahead by $116,500 in the short session, with the amicable spirit of the live match coming as somewhat of a surprise to the poker community.
The rest of the match played out in the online streets at Polk and Negreanu traded the lead multiple times over the first few online sessions, but after Day #8 Polk dominated the duel.
Polk erased the nearly $180k deficit and amassed a $596,197 lead after taking more than eight buy-ins of Negreanu on Day #12. A clearly frustrated Negreanu contended that bad luck played a major role in the lost lead, but the worst was yet to come for the longtime live poker icon.

We have talked hands and stuff here and there from the get go, but today we really talked about a bunch of different situations and spots from the challenge.
Some really fun stuff. 1 bluff he ran I cannot fucking believe lol.
Glad we buried the hatchet. A worthy opponent 💪
— Doug Polk (@DougPolkVids) February 2, 2021

Polk, one of the world’s top heads-up players, thrived in his return to poker. After retiring from the game following his $100 to $10,000 bankroll challenge, Polk came back to poker to take on Negreanu after the two reignited their long-running feud last summer.
Day #18 ended with Polk up nearly $1 million. Negreanu trimmed that lead back down to $484,073 after Day #26 on Jan. 11, only to see Polk finally cross the $1 million threshold after the Jan. 20 Day #30 session. 
On the way to taking that seven-figure lead, Negreanu’s frustration with his alleged luck turned into Polk’s own agitation toward Negreanu’s perceived unlucky run. Polk posted a YouTube rant on the eve of Day #30, which became an instant legend in the poker world.
Negreanu posted the biggest win of the challenge shortly thereafter, winning $390,032 for Day #31 on Jan. 22. After another small win on Jan. 25, however, Negreanu lost each of the final four sessions to close out the match.
Polk’s official earnings against Negreanu ended up at $1,201,807 over the course of the challenge. Just before the final session, Polk called Negreanu “a worthy opponent,” and the three-month duel between Polk and Negreanu provided entertainment the likes of which the poker community might never see again.
Check out the entire summary of the Polk-Negreanu match here.

รอยัล คาสิโน
คาสิโน 777
คาสิโน 888

Pinnacle Trade Director to deliver presentation at Ukrainian Gaming Week 2021


arko Blume, Pinnacle Trade Director, has pledged to present a “strategy to overcome the crisis on the betting market” at a conference that will be held on February 24 within the framework of the Ukrainian Gaming Week 2021.
His presentation, “Anti-crisis strategy for bookmakers,” is expected to bring answers to questions such as: “What measures should bookmakers take to maintain their position in the market during the crisis?” and “How is the audience of the betting industry-changing, and what solutions can help operators to attract and retain players?”
The key points that Blume will delve into are the following:

Latest solutions to help bookmakers survive within economic and social changes;
New trends and opportunities for streaming services;
What anti-crisis social programs exist today;
How bookmakers deal with the crisis;
Reducing costs in the field of betting: how to manage work resources;
What the players are betting on;
How to support the concept of “transparent sports”.

Since 2007, Marco has held the position of Sales Director at Pinnacle international betting provider. In his work, he is guided by the core values ​​of the betting business, which are based on strict risk control and the use of advanced models.
Pinnacle (formerly Pinnacle Sports) was founded in 1998 and launched an online betting website in 2000. The bookmaker currently offers a wide range of bets on sports and esports events. Online casino games are also available on Pinnacle’s website. Today, its clients include bettors from more than 100 countries of the world.


แทงบอล คาสิโน
sa คาสิโน
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ มือถือ
คาสิโนtrue wallet ไม่มีขั้นต่ำ

Business, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, ErisX, sports betting
CFTC considers Wall Street sports betting

Everyone’s looking at Wall Street like it’s just another casino right now, but one man wants to use the market to help sports books. Thomas Chippas, CEO of ErisX, wants to list sports betting contract futures on the stock market, giving investors and book keepers a new way to hedge.The Washington lawyer emphasized that this isn’t a way to spread sports betting to investor markets, but specifically for sports books to hedge their risk. “This is not a substitute for gaming,” he noted to Bloomberg. “There is underlying economic risk that is being hedged.”ErisX has put in their formal request to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in mid-November, and must wait a 90-day period for the public to provide comments. If the CFTC agrees to the plan, the exchange service, which also offers cryptocurrency, will offer futures for football, basketball and baseball.The CFTC isn’t taking the request lightly. They’ve asked for feedback on if the offering would be “contrary to the public interest,” as well as input on if it would affect sporting event outcomes, and if it would fall under a ban on gaming contracts. Such a ban was put in by Congress in 2010, but ErisX argues that their contracts would have nothing to do with gambling, but rather offer risk management tools for legal sportsbooks.One fear, if the proposal is accepted, is that sports books may use the ability to hedge to offer riskier bets. “The only winner under this type of proposal are the casinos themselves,” said Les Bernal, national director of the Washington advocacy group Stop Predatory Gambling.That being said, other experts think nothing will come of the proposal. Besides the potential of running afoul of congress, the precedents such a move would make might be unpalatable. And sports leagues who fought sports betting for so long have nothing to gain from this move, and likely won’t support it.But ErisX is talking about the benefits. Games that go badly against the sportsbook, almost entirely due to heavy public or sharp betting, could be hedged against should their service be allowed. That could reduce the risk to sportsbooks, allowing them to profit mostly off of handle rather than huge swings in a game.Of course, there’s always the traditional way of managing that risk: adjusting your lines. If ErisX’s dream doesn’t come to be, sportsbooks could simply invest more money in training and hiring better bookmakers, and make their profits by not offering lines that could bankrupt them.

คาสิโน ออนไลน์888
ทางเข้า คาสิโน
คาสิโน 1688
คาสิโน 1988
คาสิโน ทรูวอลเล็ต

Thinking of going back to my bar free roll tournaments

I work full-time as a grocery store manager and have yet to have anyone around me get a positive test back. I’m actually really happy about that because every day I hear about entire stores having to close for a few days because someone got a positive test and the whole store had to quarantine.Before the pandemic, I played in a bar cash free roll league and would sometimes travel cross-state to Cherokee and hit up some small buy-in tourneys if I had a few days off.I really miss playing poker in person and today my league’s newsletter came out saying the league was struggling to keep their deals with the bars they are hosted in because of low turnout. So out of a mix of loyalty, boredom, and eagerness to play live cards again, I told my league director I would probably stop in tonight to play.My question to you guys and gals is- is it worth the risk to play in person? It’s a bar after all even if the bar is doing a quarter of what it used to do in sales so there’s not that many people there. Have you played live since the pandemic started?Note: this is not a post about the pandemic itself. It’s a thing. Coronavirus isn’t a hoax and masks save lives. I’m strictly asking if I’m an asshole for wanting to go play in person or if the risks aren’t worth it.

88 คาสิโน
สมัครเอเย่น คาสิโน
คาสิโน โบนัส 100

CBS Corporation, Coronavirus (2019-nCoV), Football, National Football League, Super Bowl, Tampa (Fla)
Staging the Super Bowl During a Big Crisis

“I can only really, in some ways, applaud them in the challenge that they clearly have taken on,” said Patrick Nally, a British sports-marketing executive with deep experience in the Olympics, soccer and an array of other major sports. “At the same time, I hope that they see the need to be as responsible as they must be, and present it in a manner that really reflects the tragedy that we’re all facing.”The game represents an odd chance for an American makeover — a new year, a new administration, a new outlook. It will be a 2021 America packaged and broadcast to the world. While the N.F.L. has a chance to look really good, or really bad, in ways never imagined before, Americans may be judged right along with the league.“In many ways, they are torch-carrying for the United States as a nation,” Nally said. “If ever there was an opportunity to present, to comment, in the right, responsible manner, this is the chance of doing it.”In Mourning, or In Vegas? Other sports leagues have had a chance to address the toll of the pandemic in recent months, though not with an audience this vast or a single game this orchestrated.The issue will confront the postponed Summer Olympics in Tokyo, which were rescheduled for this July and August. Next year’s Winter Olympics in Beijing will be closely watched, to see how the Chinese spin their role in the pandemic.The question of navigating something as frivolous-seeming as sports amid an ongoing crisis is not new, though there are no true historical parallels. Wartime might be the closest thing.During World War II, the Olympics were called off, but the N.F.L. and Major League Baseball conducted seasons and championships despite some players’ being pulled into duty. The N.F.L. finished its regular season on Dec. 7, 1941, the day of the Pearl Harbor bombing, and held playoff games a week later, as scheduled.

เกมส์ยิ่งปลา คาสิโน ฟรีเครดิต
ฟรีเครดิตทดลองเล่น คาสิโน
เกมส์ คาสิโน ออนไลน์
คาสิโน ออนไลน์ได้เงินจริง

Hand Review: Did Polk Shove Too Light for Value Versus Negreanu?

February 04, 2021
Mo Nuwwarah

The ongoing $200/$400 heads-up no-limit hold’em match between Doug Polk and Daniel Negreanu has captured the attention of the poker world, particularly with the dearth of other action of interest out there.
Two legends of poker battling back and forth for pots worth sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars has naturally produced some interesting hands that merit a closer look from a strategic point of view.
Getting an expert’s perspective on such a hand isn’t easy considering how few HUNL specialists are out there and qualified to comment critically on these stakes, but PokerNews did manage to get hold of one: Kevin Rabichow. The high-stakes pro and Run It Once Poker ambassador graciously agreed to help break down a pot I found fascinating while covering the action.
Kevin Rabichow
The hand can be viewed here but for those not wishing to relive it in video form, here’s how the action goes:
Negreanu raised to $960 on the button and Polk reraised to $3,945. Negreanu four-bet to $10,800 and Polk called, bringing a flop. Both players checked and the turn was the . Polk led out $6,479 and Negreanu called. On the river, Polk shoved for $32,132. Negreanu quickly called with and won the showdown against to scoop a $98K pot.
PokerNews: How does being 125 bigs deep change preflop strategy with these hands if at all? Is everything they do here standard?
Kevin Rabichow: The interesting decision preflop as you get deeper is how do you adjust what you’re going to stack off compared to three-bet-call or just call. Maybe you three-bet less than usual here but I still think this hand’s always a three-bet. Sometimes you can five-bet all in for 100 bigs but maybe not 125.
On the flop, we see both players check. I assume that’s also pretty standard or is there an argument to bet because this is a good flop for the four-bettor’s range, and aces and queens are potentially bad turns than can cost you a pretty big pot?
It’s common for button to bet range on this flop. The key thing is it’s king-high. When the board comes king-high, the really important thing in heads-up preflop ranges is that button will have all ace-kings and big blind never has any ace-kings. You can’t say that as confidently in other formats but in heads up you can.
Daniel should probably just bet. If Doug folds queen-jack or something with an ace in it, you get some equity out of the pot and can charge a gutshot or open-ended straight draw. I think it’s a little non-standard not to bet. If I was gonna check anything, my first choice would be queens or jacks, though. If you’re gonna play checks, this hand is up there.
After a turn, Doug leads one-third of pot. Is this for standard for value and protection?
Doug is very GTO-focused. He’s trying to just play well and learn from the solver. The solver wouldn’t check very much. is the type of hand that wants to lead small. It does depend on what types of hands Daniel is checking back though.
We had seen Daniel occasionally check as strong as top pair in these four-bet pots.
That makes it really tough if he’s checking . What Doug has to ask himself is, ‘Is this hand good enough to bet for protection?’ Not just does it want to because it clearly does.
Keep in mind stuff like queen-six suited or ace-five suited are preflop bluffs and made a weak pair. That’s part of the range that gets overlooked heads up. Daniel’s gonna bluff with raggedy , . He could have pair of sixes or fives. If he folds out something like that has six clean outs, that’s also great for him.
It’s kind of thin. I think it’s still clear the bet is fine.
We see a pot-sized shove on the river. I assume it’s for value? Is this too thin?
I think on the surface, it’s a pretty normal shove in heads up. In this situation, it’s a little thin. The key thing here is Doug’s out of position. It’s a thin value shove for one pot-sized bet, so that makes the math pretty easy. If he was to check and get shoved on he needs 33% to check-call. Traditionally if you make a value-bet, you want to get called by a range you’re ahead of. When he shoves and gets called, maybe he’s got 43% equity.
It gets weird out of position with these thin, in-between hands. But, he’s ahead of , , even which might hero. A rivered pair of sevens which is unlikely but maybe a hand that bluffed preflop could have gotten here. There’s stuff that he beats but it’s certainly not thrilling.
But, Doug is someone who bluffs a lot, and Daniel will make hero calls. Maybe Doug doesn’t think check performs very well. Maybe he’s saying if he has or it’s a cooler, which I kind of agree with. I think Doug’s shoving for value fully expecting to lose more than time.
Negreanu won the huge pot with jacks.
So, even though he might be beat more than half of the time he’s called, jam can still be good for value?
You have to look at the [expected value] of check as a whole versus the EV of jam as a whole. If he jams, he always gets called by better hands and sometimes by worse hands. When he checks, Daniel will always check back the hands Doug beats. But, the concern is he will bluff sometimes and he will value-bet all the better hands. If he feels he cannot check-fold, then value-betting becomes worth considering.
Does block-betting the river make any sense?
From what I’ve seen of Daniel’s game, I think block is very likely the best play. That would probably be my first choice. I think it’s a good play. It’s quite possible Doug randomized for his sizing or just kind of got caught up in making a greedy sizing choice.
Blocking river in a spot like this is definitely part of good strategy. The likely response we’re hoping for is Daniel calls with . If that’s the play he takes even a little bit of time, that’s an amazing result. We get extra value from fives and sixes and don’t lose the max against and .
What do regular players need to understand about heads-up no-limit that makes this shove good?
I think the framework within heads-up no-limit is to realize like and , even if we think Daniel is conservative, it’s not an overwhelming majority of his range. We can’t focus so quickly on that part of his range. Because preflop ranges are so wide, it’s important to remember that ace-high needs to call the turn and and need to call river a lot of the time against a jam. Just recognizing that the overall strategy good heads-up no-limit players use in this spot isn’t overly focused on the top of Daniel’s range. There’s all this trash and all these other weak hands.
What parts of heads-up no-limit can fans watching take and try to apply to their own games?
Honestly, it’s probably just aggression. Recognizing the value of finding bets and stacking off uncomfortably light. It trickles to the rest of your strategy. The benefit of Doug having plays like this that are thin and look wild is you allow yourself to be aggressive with the bluffs in your range and find thinner value bets as a result. Your aggression goes up and you win more pots.
Almost all players are not aggressive enough, even professional players. Six-max, tournaments…players are by and large not aggressive enough. Here’s a player at the top of the game on the biggest stage and he’s going after it every pot. That’s something worth trying to emulate, I think.

ปอยเปต คาสิโน
เกมส์ยิ่งปลา คาสิโน ได้เงินจริงไหม
เล่น คาสิโน
คาสิโน 88

LATEST NEWS, Matt Waxman, Poker News, Pokerithm
Introducing POKERithm: The Debut of Live Streamed Team Duplicate Poker

With poker fans’ ever-increasing hunger for new content exacerbated by the increased time staying at home due to the pandemic, new initiatives in the industry are praiseworthy and certainly being encouraged. Enter POKERithm. My attention was first drawn to it by recent Tweets from a number of veteran poker pros, including Matt Waxman and Tristan Wade.  In a nutshell, POKERithm takes the concept of duplicate poker, incorporates the idea of teams, and harnesses the power of live streaming with expert commentary to form a unique type of poker attraction. Some additional details are provided in the promotional video below.
There’s been a good deal of buzz in the poker community about POKERithm’s debut, both from players who participated in Season 0 of the league as well as from curious viewers and casual poker fans. A total of 8 teams with 9 or 10 players apiece form the current league. Team names include The Archers, Grit, Hooligang, Moxie, Pioneers, The Positives, The Soulvers, and VikingX, and dozens of recognizable professional players are taking part in the proceedings. With 75 in total, there are too many to name here, but just to illustrate the star power, rosters include powerhouses like Joe Cada, Andrew Lichtenberger, Kelly Minkin, and Felipe Ramos.
The polished production intrigued me, too, so I struck up a conversation with Waxman, the main force behind the venture, to learn more about it. He was kind enough to answer all my questions and give us the scoop regarding how POKERithm came to be, what his goals are with the production, and what sort of unique poker programming we can expect from him and his team in the near and longer-term future.

What first gave you the idea to try out this unique concept?
This concept has been getting tweaked ever since I won WPT Paris in 2011. I used to have my friends come over, order us a bunch of pizzas, and ask everyone to test new poker formats with me with the intention of making poker into a timed sport and less like gambling.
My first variation for a poker team sport consisted of multiple super turbo tournaments crammed into one match, and the winners received points added to a scoreboard based on where they placed in the multiple tournaments played during the given time period. When time ran out we ICM’d the remaining chips and added those points to the scoreboard, but we realized after some tests that the optimal strategy was to just waste your full clock every hand when you got a reasonable lead, and the end of games ended up being a bit boring with all the stalling.
Another downfall with our first approach was that some players would be sitting out some of the time. The concept eventually evolved into the team format we have now, which is simply duplicate poker where the chips won or lost are immediately added to a running scoreboard and stacks reset every hand.
As we’re in the midst of a pandemic, it doesn’t seem possible that you filmed all this footage recently. How long has this project been in the works for?
Well, my production company that owns POKERithm was incorporated maybe 4 or 5 years ago. And our patent for my platform’s player ranking algorithm as well as our game format was filed not too long after. The first pilot I ever shot for a poker league was probably before I even made my company, around 2014. In 2018 we shot a pilot episode at Solve For Why studios, thanks to some help from my friend Matt Berkey, and then once we realized we could pull off a match, we organized a league and shot all our footage during the 2019 WSOP.
How were the teams picked?
We had a beta testing for my online platform (getting released soon) back in January of 2019. I asked  about 250 of my poker friends if they wanted to play a new poker format that gave them rankings as a player. Just over 100 of them actually played, which was a surprisingly good turnout! They seemed to really enjoy the software, and we invited the top ranked players to compete in the league.
I asked seven other people who I knew I could count on to captain teams in our first season. We then took all the players from the platform and had an auction draft for our teams. I also told every captain that they could invite 4 additional people to play on their teams because asking poker players to do anything but play tournaments during the summer is a tall order. In other words, we knew we’d need more people to fill seats in case players made day 2s of the WSOP bracelet events.
How did you decide on the name POKERithm?
The name originates from POKER + algorithm. One of the main draws to our free playing platform is that players will get rankings based on their results at the table. We use an algorithm that weighs 4 key factors to determine those rankings:

total games played (experience)
value (hand results from showdown pots)
aggression (hand results from non-showdown pots)
average points per match (the average amount of chips a player finishes their matches with)

There’s more detailed descriptions on our website, but the best way to learn our game is of course to just get in there and start playing, just like most video games these days.
What is the overarching idea here? Are you trying to prove something about the game of poker to the mainstream?
Absolutely. I’m trying to prove that people love to play poker because it challenges their minds, not only for the financial motivation. I’d like to make poker better understood and embraced by the general public.
I want to create a league that appreciates professionals and pays them to compete instead of making them fly around the country, paying excessive rake fees and costly hotel reservations. Poker players are skilled individuals, just like any other great competitors, and there’s no reason they shouldn’t get salaries based on their skill sets as opposed to simply their brand and likability.
Who would you say is your target audience: the existing poker community or new people outside of poker?
My target audience is of course poker fans, but more importantly fans who love watching streams and are craving the opportunity to prove their skills without risking their hard-earned cash. After we find our base in poker, I’d like to introduce our game to people outside of poker, especially those who love video games, more specifically strategic games. And if everything goes to plan, I’d like our target audience to be anyone in the world with an internet connection.
What’s at stake for the participating players?
Well there’s no gambling, but players are paid bonus incentives based on how well they compete individually and as a team. Eventually a player’s reputation will be at stake, just like any other great competition. But for Season 0 currently streaming on Twitch and YouTube, it was mostly a learning process and a mission to prove our concept. Everyone was just having fun playing, and the footage we captured as the season develops will certainly illustrate that.
An idea involving this many people and moving parts obviously takes a good deal of funding. In what way(s) are you hoping to monetize POKERithm and have it continue to expand?
Advertisements, sponsorships, in-game purchases, affiliate deals and maybe even merchandising are the main ways we plan to generate revenue, but right now it’s simply a growth game. We’re just focused on sharing our product with the poker community, getting eyes watching Season 0 and having as many players as we can competing in our online games. We’d love if poker fans reading this article could head over to our YouTube channel and Subscribe. They won’t be disappointed!
Where to Watch
POKERithm streams every Tuesday on Twitch, YouTube, and Twitter starting at 4pm Eastern. For a better idea of what you can expect to see, check out the first episode below.

POKERithm Series Premiere | Season 0 Episode 1
— POKERithm (@POKERithm) January 5, 2021

About Robbie StrazynskiRobbie founded Cardplayer Lifestyle in 2009.
Having quite literally learned how to play poker around the kitchen table as a child, “living a Cardplayer Lifestyle” is something that he’s always aspired to. After having worked as a copywriter and marketing professional in the online gaming industry for a number of years, Robbie transitioned to become self-employed in the poker media industry in March 2017.
Robbie translated Pulling The Trigger: The Autobiography of Poker Pro Eli Elezra, from Hebrew into English. He is also the host of the roundtable panel show The Orbit, the CardsChat Podcast, and creator of the Poker Notes Live mobile app.
Robbie received the 2018 Global Poker Award for Charitable Initiative of the Year and in 2019 he was recognized by the Women’s Poker Association with their Excellence Award as Media Support Person of the Year.
Connect with Robbie on Twitter @cardplayerlife, or via email:

รอยัล คาสิโน
คาสิโน 777
คาสิโน 888